Equipment / Brands
Headlamps Armytek pour la caving: analyse, Pros et limites
Guide Armytek en caving: points forts, limites (dont topo), profils cibles et lien direct vers le Comparison.
Lamp sheet / Lighting
Armytek is often chosen for strong output per euro and standard cells. For DistoX survey work, magnetic interference is the main point to check before standardizing.
Armytek Wizard C2 Pro Max LR~ 3.6 /5
View the full multi-brand comparison
Key characteristics
| Theme | Characteristic |
|---|---|
| Positioning | Versatile headlamps with controlled cost, commonly used for regular caving. |
| Energy | Standard cells (18650/21700 depending on model), useful for club logistics and travel. |
| Water resistance | High IP ratings on flagship models (IP68), suited to wet caving outside sustained diving use. |
| Main field note | User feedback often reports magnetic impact on DistoX in survey context. |
| Observed market | Regularly cited in caving for performance/price ratio. |
Pros
- Overall reliability is good in caving use outside magnetic topo constraints.
- Excellent output/price ratio.
- Standard cells are easy to share across setups.
- Customer support is often described as reactive.
Cons
- Magnetic interference with DistoX reported in surveying.
- Ergonomics/mounting are more general-purpose than dedicated caving setups.
- Marked thermal step-down in turbo mode.
- Isolated reports mention accidental activation/overheating in transport.
Best for
| Profile | Armytek fit |
|---|---|
| Regular caving outside instrument survey | Very good fit for performance/price and standard batteries. |
| Budget-conscious club use | Relevant for equipping multiple users without full premium cost. |
| DistoX survey | High caution: verify magnetic behavior before standardization. |
| Heavy specialized exploration | Possible, but many teams prefer dedicated caving brands in this context. |
Compare with other brands
Open the caving headlamp comparison
Manufacturer website: Armytek.